Sub-principle

There are no fields or forces as independent entities. What conventional physics describes as fields and "forces" are actually patterns of matter in motion.

Core Principle

This axiom establishes the ontological foundation of the Astro Atomic Model (AAM). It asserts that physical reality consists of only three fundamental constituents:

  1. Space — the infinite container in which all phenomena occur
  2. Matter — physical substance with mass and dimension
  3. Motion — the movement of matter through space

All observed physical phenomena—from gravitation to magnetism, from atomic spectra to chemical bonding—can be explained purely through the mechanical interactions of matter in motion within space. This eliminates the need for abstract concepts like "fields," "forces," or "action at a distance."

Understanding Aether in the AAM

In conventional physics, "aether" was discarded as a concept. In the AAM, aether is restored—but not as a mysterious substance. Rather, aether at any level consists of ordinary matter from smaller scales.

At our experiential level (SL0), the aether comprises particles so small we cannot directly observe them—specifically, matter from similarity level SL-2. At the atomic level (SL-1), that level's aether consists of even smaller particles from SL-3.

This creates a hierarchical structure: what appears as "ordinary matter" at one scale becomes "aether" for the scale two levels above. The full implications of this relationship will be developed in subsequent axioms addressing the infinite divisibility of matter and the self-similar structure of reality across all scales.

What This Axiom Eliminates

1. Electromagnetic Fields

Conventional physics treats electric and magnetic fields as independent entities that exist in space and exert forces on charged particles. The AAM rejects this, explaining these phenomena through mechanical matter-in-motion mechanisms (detailed in Axiom 8):

Electrical Phenomena:

  • Result from gravitational configurations at atomic scale
  • "Positive charge" = gravitationally incomplete structure (nucleon without valence shell)
  • "Negative charge" = gravitationally completing element (the valence shell)
  • Electrical attraction/repulsion = gravitational shadowing interactions
  • All electrical properties reduce to gravitational shadowing (same mechanism as gravity, just at atomic scale)

Magnetic Phenomena:

  • Result from aligned momentum valence shells in conductive elements
  • Conductive elements possess dual valence cloud structure: bonding cloud + momentum cloud
  • Current (gravitational orbitron flow) aligns bonding shells → orients atoms → aligns momentum shells
  • Aligned momentum shells create extended orbitron 'field' = magnetic 'field'
  • Perpendicular relationship from geometric cloud orientations

Mechanical Connection:

  • Electrical and magnetic phenomena are distinct but mechanically coupled
  • Current flow creates alignment cascade: bonding shells → atomic orientation → momentum shell alignment
  • Both reduce to matter in motion (gravitational flow + orbitron cloud alignment)
  • No abstract 'fields'—only physical matter configurations and distributions

2. Forces as Fundamental

Instead of treating forces as causes, the AAM recognizes them as descriptions of effects:

  • "Gravitational force" → Momentum transfer from asymmetric aether bombardment (geometric shadowing)
  • "Electrical force" → Gravitational shadowing between incomplete/complete atomic configurations
  • "Magnetic force" → Extended orbitron clouds from aligned momentum valence shells
  • "Strong/weak nuclear forces" → Magnetic coupling between nucleons at close range + gravitational shadowing

All apparent "forces" reduce to mechanical interactions of matter in motion. What conventional physics treats as four fundamental forces, the AAM explains through geometric shadowing and mechanical coupling at different scales.

3. Action at a Distance

All interactions occur through direct contact or through a medium (aether). There is no mysterious influence propagating through empty space.

4. Point Particles

All particles have mass and dimension. The mathematical idealization of "point-like" particles has no place in physical reality.

Key Mechanisms Supporting Axiom 1

1. Gravity via Geometric Shadowing

The Mechanism:

  • Aether particles continuously bombard all matter from all directions at high velocities
  • When two masses are near each other, each mass blocks (shadows) some of the aether bombardment that would otherwise reach the other mass
  • Outer sides (facing away from each other) receive full aether bombardment from all directions
  • Inner sides (facing each other) receive reduced bombardment due to the shadowing effect
  • This creates a bombardment asymmetry: more impacts from outside than from inside
  • Net result: both masses are pushed toward each other (toward the region of lower bombardment)

Key Features:

  • Purely geometric — the effect arises from spatial blocking, not energy dissipation
  • Local interaction — no long-range particle travel required; aether is already everywhere
  • No aberration — the shadowing effect is instantaneous; gravitational effects propagate through the entrained aether medium almost instantly
  • Scales with density and cross-section — denser matter blocks more aether; larger cross-sections create larger shadows

Why Atomic-Scale "Gravity" Appears Stronger:

Atomic particles are much denser than astronomical bodies. At similarity level SL-1:

  • Higher density means more effective shadowing per unit volume
  • Particles are closer together, making the shadowing effect more pronounced
  • The same geometric mechanism produces effects ~1042 times stronger (conventionally called "electromagnetic forces")

Reference: This builds on Le Sage's push theory of gravitation and Glenn Borchardt's refinements in "Infinite Universe Theory," with emphasis on the geometric shadowing mechanism as the primary cause.

2. Magnetism via Dual Valence Cloud Structure

The Atomic Structure:

Atoms contain multiple structural components at different scales:

  • Nucleus (very small, dense) — iron-based nucleons
  • Electron planes (small, close to nucleus)
    • Contain planetrons (large orbitrons) in organized orbital patterns
    • Responsible for atomic spectra
  • Dual Valence Clouds (in conductive/magnetic elements):
    • Bonding valence cloud: Right size for chemical bonding and orbitron flow
    • Momentum valence cloud: Larger, perpendicular to bonding cloud, creates magnetic effects when aligned

Conductive/Magnetic Materials:

In elements like iron, copper, nickel, and cobalt:

  1. Dual valence cloud structure allows both electrical conductivity and magnetic properties
  2. Bonding cloud handles orbitron flow (electrical current) and chemical bonding
  3. Momentum cloud (perpendicular to bonding cloud) creates magnetic effects when aligned
  4. When current flows, bonding shells align → atoms orient → momentum shells align
  5. Result: Magnetic domains where momentum valence shells of billions of atoms align

3. Chemical Bonding via Gravitational Shadowing

The Process:

  1. Initial approach (atoms far apart): Gravitational shadowing between atoms creates attraction → atoms move closer
  2. Critical distance: Valence clouds begin to interfere → collisions between orbitrons occur
  3. Repulsion: Colliding orbitrons transfer momentum, creating outward push
  4. Equilibrium: Distance where gravitational attraction = orbitron collision repulsion
  5. Bonding through valence shells: Valence orbitrons transfer between atoms gravitationally, creating stable bonding configurations

This Explains:

  • Atomic radii — equilibrium distances for different elements
  • Pauli exclusion — orbitron collision mechanics, not quantum wave functions
  • Bond lengths — element-specific equilibrium distances
  • Chemical reactivity — atoms with incomplete configurations (missing shells) are reactive
  • Valence — valence cloud geometry determines bonding capacity
  • Ionic bonding — complete orbitron transfer between atoms
  • Covalent bonding — shared orbitrons between atoms

4. Electrical Conductivity via Orbitron Transfer

In Conductive Materials (like copper):

  • Valence clouds are geometrically arranged so orbitrons can transfer between clouds of neighboring atoms
  • The outer structures of adjacent atoms have compatible geometry and proximity
  • "Current flow" = cascading orbitron transfers from cloud to cloud through the material
  • Resistance = friction and collisions during the transfer process

Temperature Effects:

  • Higher temperature increases thermal motion of electron planes and valence clouds
  • This disrupts cloud alignment and transfer pathways
  • Result: conductivity decreases with temperature in metals

5. Rutherford Gold Foil Experiment Reinterpreted

Conventional Interpretation:

Alpha particles deflected at sharp angles indicate strong repulsive force from concentrated positive charge (nucleus).

AAM Interpretation:

  1. Gravitational shadowing at atomic scale is extraordinarily strong (atomic particles are very dense)
  2. Alpha particle approaches gold nucleus → strong gravitational attraction pulls it toward nucleus
  3. If the particle doesn't hit directly → it passes close by
  4. Gravitational slingshot sends particle back at sharp angle (like spacecraft using planetary flybys)
  5. Net result: appears like repulsion, but actually attraction + momentum conservation

Key Point: The nucleus's gravitational shadow dominates the interaction. The nucleus is much smaller than conventionally thought, and the apparent "Coulomb repulsion" is actually a gravitational slingshot effect.

Critical Terminology Clarification

Understanding Planetrons, Electrons, and Atomic Structure

Planetrons vs. Electrons vs. Planets

Three Key Correspondences:

  1. Planets ↔ Planetrons: ONE-TO-ONE
    • Our solar system (single-star system): 8 planets (Mercury through Neptune)
    • Hydrogen atom (single-nucleon): 8 planetrons (Mercury through Neptune analogs)
    • Each planetron corresponds to one planet
  2. Electrons ↔ Electron Planes (Planetron Planes): ONE-TO-ONE
    • 1 electron (conventional chemistry) = 1 complete electron plane (AAM)
    • 1 electron plane contains multiple planetrons orbiting together
    • NOT: 1 electron = 1 planetron (this would be incorrect)
  3. Atoms ↔ Star Systems: BY NUCLEON COUNT
    • Single-nucleon atoms (hydrogen) ↔ Single-star systems
    • Multi-nucleon atoms (helium, etc.) ↔ Multi-star systems

Hydrogen-Specific Structure (Single-Star Analog)

Hydrogen atom:

  • Conventional chemistry: 1 electron
  • AAM interpretation: 1 electron plane containing ~8 planetrons
  • Direct analog: Our solar system (single star with 8 planets)
  • The 8 planetrons orbit together in a single plane

Why 8 planetrons for hydrogen:

  • Hydrogen has ONE nucleon (single proton)
  • Corresponds to single-star systems
  • Our solar system is the template (8 planets)
  • This structure is specific to hydrogen and similar single-nucleon atoms

Heavier Elements (Multi-Star System Analogs)

Important: The 8-planetron-per-plane structure is hydrogen-specific and applies to single-nucleon atoms corresponding to single-star systems. Heavier elements have different structures:

Helium (2 nucleons):

  • Conventional chemistry: 2 electrons
  • AAM interpretation: 2 electron planes
  • Analog: Binary star system (2 stars)
  • Number of planetrons per plane: requires further investigation

Heavier Elements (3+ nucleons):

  • Correspond to multi-star systems (trinary, quaternary, etc.)
  • Multi-star systems have different gravitational dynamics than single-star systems
  • Different numbers and configurations of planets would be stable
  • Therefore: different numbers and configurations of planetrons per plane

Chemical Behavior and Spectral Lines

Chemical Properties:

  • Depend on the NUMBER OF ELECTRON PLANES (= number of "electrons" in conventional chemistry)
  • Hydrogen: 1 plane = monovalent behavior
  • Helium: 2 planes = inert behavior
  • Not determined by total number of individual planetrons

Spectral Lines:

  • Come from INDIVIDUAL PLANETRONS within the planes
  • Each spectral line corresponds to one specific planetron
  • Hydrogen's spectrum maps to its 8 planetrons (Mercury line, Venus line, Earth line, etc.)
  • Fine structure comes from moons orbiting those planetrons

Hydrogen Spectrum and Planetary Correspondence

Note: This section describes the hydrogen atom specifically—a single-nucleon atom analogous to a single-star system with 8 planets/planetrons.

The Mechanism:

Each spectral line in hydrogen's emission spectrum corresponds to a specific planetron in the hydrogen atom's single electron plane. The lines are not "quantum jumps" but rather gravitational signatures of individual planetrons responding to gravitational perturbations propagating through the atom.

Line-by-Planetron Mapping (Hydrogen's 8 Planetrons):

  • Shortest wavelength line ← Innermost planetron (Mercury analog)
  • Second line ← Second planetron (Venus analog)
  • Third line ← Third planetron (Earth analog)
  • Fourth line ← Fourth planetron (Mars analog)
  • Fifth line ← Fifth planetron (Jupiter analog)
  • Sixth line ← Sixth planetron (Saturn analog)
  • Seventh line ← Seventh planetron (Uranus analog)
  • Eighth line ← Eighth planetron (Neptune analog)

Fine Structure:

The fine structure observed in some spectral lines is caused by moons orbiting those planetrons. Just as planets have moons in our solar system, planetrons have their own satellites that create additional gravitational perturbations.

Why Our Solar System Doesn't Match Exactly:

The relative distances of our solar system's planets don't perfectly match the relative wavelengths of hydrogen's spectral lines because our solar system hasn't settled into its final stable configuration yet. This settling process:

  • Takes millions to billions of years at SL0 (our scale)
  • Takes a "split second" at SL-1 (atomic scale) due to time scaling
  • When complete, our solar system's planetary spacing will exactly match hydrogen's spectral line ratios

Implications and Applications

For Atomic Structure

  • Atoms are miniature gravitational systems, not quantum probability clouds
  • Spectral lines represent individual planetrons responding to gravitational perturbations
  • Each hydrogen spectral line corresponds to a specific planetron
  • Fine structure in spectral lines is caused by moons orbiting planetrons

For Cosmology

  • Same physics operates at all scales (astro-atomic symmetry)
  • Our solar system is literally a hydrogen atom at a higher similarity level
  • No need for different physics at different scales

For Thermodynamics

  • Heat is motion of matter at various scales
  • Temperature is average kinetic energy of submicrocosmic motion
  • All thermal phenomena reduce to mechanical motion

For Electromagnetism

  • No separate electromagnetic theory needed
  • "Electric" effects = gravitational shadowing at atomic scale
  • "Magnetic" effects = organized rotational patterns
  • Light is wave motion through aether medium

Supporting Evidence from Known Physics

  1. Newton's Three Laws — All three laws describe only pushes, never pulls. Any apparent "pull" can be recast as a push.
  2. Sagnac Effect — Demonstrated that light is wave motion, not particle motion. This requires a medium (aether) for transmission.
  3. Planetary Orbital Patterns — Studies like the Titius-Bode Law show non-random planetary spacing. Similar patterns should exist in atomic electron plane configurations.
  4. Fluid Mechanics Analogies — Ionel Dinu's demonstrations show how rotation in fluids creates attraction and repulsion effects.
  5. Conservation Laws — All conservation laws follow naturally from mechanical interactions.

Open Questions for Future Investigation

Quantitative Models

  1. Can we derive the exact scattering angles from Rutherford's experiment using gravitational slingshot formulas?
  2. What is the mathematical relationship between aether pressure gradients and observed "field strengths"?
  3. Can we map all hydrogen spectral lines to specific planetron positions?
  4. What is the predicted final orbital configuration of our solar system based on hydrogen's spectral ratios?

Structural Details

  1. What are the specific electron plane configurations for different elements beyond hydrogen?
  2. How many planetrons exist in each electron plane for helium and other multi-nucleon atoms?
  3. How many inner planes form the gyroscope in ferromagnetic elements?
  4. What determines the geometry of valence clouds for different elements?

Dynamic Processes

  1. What happens at the molecular level during phase transitions?
  2. How do valence clouds rearrange during chemical reactions?
  3. What is the mechanism of heat transfer through electron plane interactions?

Relationship to Other Axioms

Axiom 1 serves as the foundational principle from which all other axioms and mechanisms derive. It does not depend on other axioms but rather establishes the basic ontology of the AAM.

The subsequent axioms build upon this foundation:

  • Axiom 2 (Infinity of universe) — extends the scope of space and matter
  • Axiom 3 (Infinite divisibility) — specifies the nature of matter
  • Axioms 4-10 — Further specify properties and behaviors within this framework